ZMX Music launches; reinvents sheet music industryZMX Music today launched its new direct-to-fan sheet music delivery system, providing musical artists with a new and exciting way to connect with fans through their web site, MySpace, and Facebook pages. Artists get a new and valuable source of revenue and consumers get instant, convenient access to sheet music for songs from their favorite artists. “After 18 years of requests for sheet music from fans, I finally found the solution to getting Ellis Paul’s music out there. ZMX Music lets us take care of this demand and bring another income stream into the mix” “The traditional sheet music business has high costs and too many layers in the distribution chain,” according to Eric Ziering, founder and CEO. “ZMX Music has a more efficient process that lets us lower prices to consumers and pay more to composers.” Historically, only Top 40 artists have been able to make money selling sheet music. By streamlining production and distribution, ZMX Music allows thousands more musicians to tap into this revenue stream, earning royalties three to five times the industry average. “Digital music distribution has fueled an explosion in variety and choice for everyone, and ZMX Music is doing the same thing for printed music.” ZMX Music spotlight artists include Tracy Bonham, Grammy Award nominee for Best Alternative Music Performance and Best Female Vocalist, and Ellis Paul, winner of 13 Boston Music Awards. “After 18 years of requests for sheet music from fans, I finally found the solution to getting Ellis Paul’s music out there. ZMX Music lets us take care of this demand and bring another income stream into the mix,” according to Ralph Jaccodine, Ellis Paul’s longtime manager. Traditional sheet music typically costs over $5.00 per song, and customers purchasing online can only see or print the music using special software. ZMX delivers easy-to-use Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files, so customers can easily see, save, and print the music. Songs are priced at $1.00 to $2.00 each and composers earn royalties up to 50 percent. Financial transactions rely on Amazon Payments, one of the internet’s most trusted payment services. Headquartered in Newton, MA, ZMX Music is reinventing the sheet music industry with a direct-to-fan publishing system that offers a better deal to everyone – musicians and consumers alike. For more information on ZMX Music. source : Press release |
Making Money in the New Music Biz
But which ones are really producing serious revenues?
Here 32 different possible possible revenue streams for artists, as compiled by the Future of Music Coalition (FMC). 
The group is currently conducting a survey of musicians to figure out which streams are working the best. These are just a sample .
If you are a composer or songwriter, here are possible revenue streams from your musical compositions…
1. Retail sales: Mechanical royalties from physical sales of recordings of your songs at stores, concerts or via mail order
2. Digital sales: Mechanical royalties from digital sales via online services (CD Baby, iTunes, Amazon, eMusic, Reverbnation,Rhapsody, MySpace Music)
3. Sheet music sales.
4. PRO Royalties: Royalties for the public performance of your work (airplay on radio, TV, movies, jukeboxes, live performance and foreign royalties, and home recording and foreign levy payments) as distributed to you by ASCAP/BMI/SESAC.
5. Advances from publishing companies during a publishing deal.
6. Payments from publishers for litigation settlements.
7. Commissions for works.
If you are a performer (think Taylor Swift), possible revenue from sound recordings…
8. Digital performance royalties: Royalties for the digital performance of your recordings — airplay on satellite radio, webcast stations, cable TV stations — distributed to you by SoundExchange.
9. Advances from record labels that are not just reimbursement of recording or touring expenses.
10. Label payments for tour support or recording expenses.
11. Payments from labels for litigation settlements.
12. AARC royalties: collected for digital recording of your songs, foreign private copying levies, and foreign record rental royalties, distributed to US artists by AARC.
13. AFM Payments (TV, Film): Payments from the Film Musicians Secondary Markets Fund to performers on recordings used in TV and other secondary uses.
14. AFM Payments (Recordings): Sound Recording Special Payments Fund to performers for the sales of recorded music
15. AFM/AFTRA Payments: Payments from the AFM/AFTRA Intellectual Property Rights Distribution Fund (distributes recording and performance royalties to the non-featured artists)
Possible revenue from licensing your musical composition or your sound recording…
16. Ringtone Sales: Mechanical revenue from ringtone sales
17. Synch Licenses: Synchronization royalties based on master rights licensing your song to TV/movies/video games/commercials
18. Sampling Licenses: Licensing fees from other musicians sampling your songs.
If you’re a performer, possible revenue from live performances…
19. Touring and shows: compensation for playing live shows or performances, including busking.
Revenue from a performer’s brand…
20. Merchandise sales: hats, t-shirts, posters, etc.
21. Sponsorship: of tour or of a band/artist.
22. Direct financial support from fans/patrons.
23. Ad revenue or other miscellaneous income from your website properties (click-throughs, commissions on Amazon sales,Google etc.)
24. Acting in television, movies, commercials.
25. Product endorsements.
26. Other licensing of your persona (to video games, comic books, etc.)
Revenue from an artist’s knowledge of the craft…
27. Work for hire/hired as a studio or live musician or composer
28. Work as a music teacher.
29. AFM/AFTRA session payments: Session payments for recording sessions, TV appearances, and performances flowing from synch licenses
30. Producer: income from producing or music direction
Other ways a musicians’ work can be funded:
31. Government grants.
32. Nonprofit/foundation grants.
For additional resource on creating a revenue stream for your music check out the book “21 Steps for Success in the New Music Biz“.
Just Follow the Money
Look no further than the recording industry to see Charles Darwin’s theory of “survival of the fittest” in full swing. Record companies duke it out for control of charts and radio stations, while artists push to remain relevant in a time of abysmal record sales and dwindling ticket distribution.
Profit is the name of the game; recording industries churn through artists and bands, milling the music industry for financial gain.
But why should you care? According to a study performed by Nielsen SoundScan, record sales have declined to pre-1991 levels. The music industry has been failing for quite a while and the effect is all but invisible — labels such as EMI and Warner Media Group have been cutting thousands of jobs and losing value. Since then, they have resorted to taking creative control away from artists and instituting increasingly ravenous and profit-funneling contracts. The death toll for musical diversity is ringing.
Turn on the radio and you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about: Auto-Tune, a millionaire rapper complaining about the harsh life on the streets, a prepubescent 16-year-old boy singing about his unconquerable love for a girl — they’re all acts perpetuated by a sinking industry.
I can’t blame the recording industry completely. Illegal music pirating has ravaged the business, causing labels to respond desperately from sinking too far into the red. But institutionalizing increasingly voracious contracts with musicians is a pathetic method to recover dwindling profits. Major music labels are already notorious for dishing out diabolical contracts to their artists; most bands only see 12 percent of profits generated from CD sales — even less after they pay marketing fees, CD printing costs and other expenses to the label. Save for the few success stories, most artists are lucky to receive a few thousand dollars worth of profit.
And it only gets worse. New types of contracts, such as the “360 deal,” essentially treat bands as brands, exchanging more money upfront for a larger slice of the returns from merchandise, performances and other money-generating sources.
Of course, much of the money given to the band goes immediately toward paying back record companies for the fees associated with creating and distributing the CD in the first place. But while CDs are only generally successful during a brief period of time, revenue from performances continues to collect through the lifespan of the band. Even the lifespan of the band is controlled by record companies, which often commit artists to as many as eight record contracts before the artist is able to sign to another label. I wonder how much grinning and rubbing of hands took place after that strategy was devised.
The manipulation of artists by music industry fat cats is only the beginning. Payola, the record companies’ practice of paying off radio stations to play their singles, is also heavily practiced in the industry. To anyone who’s ever heard the same damn song played repeatedly throughout the course of an hour, now you know whom to blame.
Comically, as the government seeks to ban the practice, music labels continuously find new and innovative ways to bribe DJs to play their respective songs. When outright bribes were banned, labels siphoned funds to DJs through a third party. When that was banned, music labels began awarding DJs vacations and gifts — purely out of the goodness of their hearts, I’m sure.
This forged sense of hype and persistent abuse of musicians carried out by record labels has inspired artists to evolve and challenge the age-old system, with varying degrees of success. Radiohead had perhaps one of the most interesting approaches, offering consumers the ability to download its album “In Rainbows” for the price they thought it was worth — be it zero dollars or as much as $212 (the equivalent of £99 at the time of release).
The ballsy move paid off. Though reportedly 62 percent of downloaders chose to pay nothing, the other 38 percent contributed an average of $6 for their copies — accumulating the band far more money than if it had gone through a major label. As an added bonus, Radiohead fans knew the money was going straight to the band, and not through a record label whoring its band out for money.
That 38 percent gives hope to an industry currently burning to the ground. Fans have the obligation to support artists, or risk losing them to a monstrous, money-driven machine, draining bands of their profits. Otherwise, this abuse will continue like a broken record.
… will continue like a broken record.
… will continue like a …
Source: The Daily Aztec
—Chris Pocock is a journalism junior.





